Despite Facebook’s attempts, pro-Trump events, groups still flourish
Facebook executive leaders promise they are doing everything they can to prevent the platform from being a tool for an anticipated new wave of violence in the nation’s capital in the upcoming days. At the same time, however, content threatening violence is still up on Facebook, and those same executives are downplaying how big a role the platform had in last week’s events at the US Capitol.
Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg gave a livestreamed interview with Reuters Monday in which she said President Donald Trump is not likely to get his Facebook account reinstated following the company’s “indefinite” ban.
“Even the president is not above the polices we have,” Sandberg said. “We have no plans to let him [back] in.”
But even though she reiterated the president was banned specifically for fomenting violence on the platform, Sandberg downplayed the role Facebook may have had in bringing the mob to the Capitol in the first place.
“We know this was organized online,” Sandberg told Reuters. “We took down QAnon, Proud Boys, Stop the Steal—anything that was talking about possible violence last week. Our enforcement’s never perfect, so I’m sure there were still things on Facebook, [but] I think these events were largely organized on platforms that don’t have our abilities to stop hate and don’t have our standards and don’t have our transparency.”
Still, she added, “Certainly to this day we are working to find any single mention that might be linked to this, and making sure we get it down as quickly as possible.”
It is true that a great deal of planning the various groups and individuals did last week took place on less-mainstream communication platforms, such as Parler, Telegram, Gab, 4chan, and dedicated pro-Trump forums. However, the insurrectionists responsible for the attack were not exclusively on those platforms—and the mainstream political figures who egged them on were explicitly present on mainstream platforms, including Twitter and Facebook.
Facebook clearly knows it has a problem with violent users and content; otherwise, the platform wouldn’t have needed to take the actions it has taken this week.
Chief among those supporters of the mob was Trump himself, as Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged last week when Facebook deleted a few of Trump’s posts and suspended his account.
Trump’s decision to use Facebook “to condone rather than condemn the actions of his supporters at the Capitol building has rightly disturbed people in the US and around the world,” Zuckerberg said at the time. “We removed these statements yesterday because we judged that their effect—and likely their intent—would be to provoke further violence.”
Facebook is also apparently quietly concerned that violence may spill over into retaliation against company employees. Facebook’s security team this week told workers to “avoid wearing or carrying Facebook-branded items at this time,” The Information was first to report, seemingly to reduce the chance of becoming targets.
As part of its “preparations” for Inauguration Day, Facebook on Monday said it would ban the phrase “stop the steal,” a rallying cry used by those who don’t (or don’t want to) believe in the fact that President-elect Joe Biden won the election (a group that includes President Trump).
The company added:
We’ve had emergency measures in place since before the US elections such as not recommending civic groups for people to join. Last week, we implemented several additional ones, including increasing the requirement of Group admins to review and approve posts before they can go up, automatically disabling comments on posts in Groups that start to have a high rate of hate speech or content that incites violence, and using AI to further demote content that likely violates our policies. We’re keeping these measures in place.
“Any single mention”
Facebook, however, is clearly failing to go after “any single mention” of statements that could provoke or contribute to further violence, despite its increased efforts.
A cursory search of Facebook “events” in and near Washington, DC, next week brought up several gatherings and demonstrations that seem designed to interfere with Biden’s inauguration. Some are planned over the weekend, in the days ahead of the event, while others call for participants to gather at the Capitol on January 20—Inauguration Day itself.
The same quick, cursory, five-minute search also brought up a half-dozen private groups that say they plan to bring together “patriots” to march on Washington during the week of the Inauguration, as well as one public group where members were posting threatening content such as a picture of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), with the text, “WHY can’t ‘someone’ shut this POS’s mouth??? … SHE ABSOLUTELY NEEDS TO BE LEAD [sic] OUT TO PASTURE.”
Neither is Facebook’s block on “stop the steal” working terribly well as of yet, as Ars’ own Timothy Lee has discovered.
In the meantime, the District of Columbia is already shutting down for blocks around the Capitol, and heavy law enforcement and street closures are expected to remain in place through January 24.